Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Luca Wiedenmann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kjaer vs Wiedenmann analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Luca Wiedenmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kjaer 0 - 0 Wiedenmann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kjaer has won 55.61% of points on their second serve, while Wiedenmann has won 49.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kjaer, in recent form, has won 61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wiedenmann has won 55.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.9% and 36.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kjaer has saved 65.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wiedenmann has saved 63.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kjaer has won 73.68% of matches played (W/L 14/ 5), with Wiedenmann winning 64.71% (W/L 33/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kjaer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 100% (W/L 1/ 0), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Wiedenmann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 62/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Kjaer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.25% of matches (W/L 13/ 3), where as Wiedenmann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kjaer has played against opponents with an average rank of 91.95 while Wiedenmann has played against players with an average rank of 192.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kjaer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wiedenmann has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kjaer has converted 56.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wiedenmann has converted 42.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
753
Rank
748
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
660
Rank
544
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
74% (14-5)
Career Total W/L
69% (100-44)
82% (14-3)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kjaer VS Wiedenmann H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | Luca Wiedenmann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (14/3) | 67% (12/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (29/8) | 60% (26/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (205/123) | 55% (213/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 91% (10/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 45 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:56 | 1:54:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.18 | 227.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (573/965) | 59% (738/1258) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (387/573) | 69% (512/738) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (218/392) | 49% (257/520) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (70/123) | 42% (69/163) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (489/1014) | 44% (552/1255) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) | 69% (11/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (14/17) | 67% (12/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 50% (8/4) |
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats 
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Agwi
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Giovanni Calvano
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Matthew William Donald
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Stijn Slump
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Jiri Barnat
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Wiedenmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Mika Brunold
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Sebastian Sorger
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
102)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Luca Castagnola
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Mak Mikovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
118
|
0-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Paul Woerner
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kjaer Vs Wiedenmann Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kjaer are available here and Wiedenmann photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
